THINGS I LIKE: Vonnegut’s TIMEQUAKE

timequakeThere is no way a beautiful woman can live up to what she looks like for any appreciable length of time.

-Kurt Vonnegut

Timequake, it was said, would be Kurt Vonnegut’s last novel.  As it turns out, he was, in fact, sadly correct.  We all hoped that one day, Kurt would break his silence, get tired of not writing again, surprise us all with a broken promise.  IT never happened.

For a lot of people, that’s really too bad — the book was not well-received.  Which to me is too bad.  Certainly, some of his books are better as whole pieces, at least more accessible. And Timequake really isn’t a novel, as much as a collection of ponderings, and documenting the process of writing the first iteration of Timequake, and bits and pieces of that novel, and musings on life.

It’s that experimental idea that makes the book so wonderful to read.  Because it should be filled with a sense of disconnect, leaving you wanting a thread that runs through all, but it isn’t and doesn’t. Somehow it works.

The plot — such as it were — is simple, and brilliant in its simplicity: there is a timequake that rolls the years back a decade, from 2001 to 1991.  And when time finally resets itself, and starts moving forward again, everything happens exactly as it once did for ten years.  All the same actions and reactions, lives and deaths, triumphs and mistakes. This time, though, the person carries full awareness of what’s coming.

If you knew that you might one day have to relive these ten years of your life, would you be acting and reacting like you do?  Knowing with all certainty that you’ll have to relive it again?

Timequake is filled with bits and pieces, perhaps a final clearing space for Vonnegut’s thoughts that never found a larger home over the years. I don’t know if he’d be really happy about having to relive any ten years of his life, but I know that being presented with that thought helped me shaped my own life going forward.

I try to reread it every six or eight months — both to remind myself of certain things, and because if I have to rewind and relive my life, at least I’ll know that every few months, I’ll be reading a good book again.

Many people need desperately to receive this message: “I feel and think much as you do, care about many of the things you care about, although most people don’t care about them. You are not alone.”

KV

THINGS I LIKE: Other movies

MEMENTO: I suppose a lot of what I like about this is from a filmmaking/storytelling perspective – Christopher Nolan makes such a potentially confusing movie, but it all works perfectly. It’s a mystery on so many levels, and trying to figure it out, while leading the viewer nowhere, is a lot of fun.  Well-crafted and well told.

[youtube=http://www.youtube.com/watch?v=UFWAE1CffbY]

DEAD MAN: I generally loathe Jarmusch films — they strike me as 30 frames per second of bullshit indie movie posing.  But something about this flick — starring Johnny Depp and Iggy Pop!, with music by Neil Young — is pure movie magic.  Also, it’s black & white, another (usual) turn-off for me that somehow works perfectly here.

[youtube=http://www.youtube.com/watch?v=07xKQakj1hM]

SUNSHINE: Danny Boyle’s philosophical sci-fi thriller is in my mind hte most underrated film of this century so far.  The story appeals to my sense of wonder at the world outside our world, and at the physical processes that allow for life as we know it.  What grabbed me and made me come back repeatedly to this film was both the astonishing visuals, particlarly the last 30 minutes of the film, and both the sound design and ambient scoring.  This is truly one of the most cinematic films of the last ten years, and inspired me to purchase a Blu-Ray player.

[youtube=http://www.youtube.com/watch?v=YZ2-xR54UDU]

SIXTH SENSE: Yeah, yeah, Bruce Willis was dead the whole time. But bullshit on you if you say you saw it coming.  The one film Shyamalan ever got right (Unbreakable wasn’t too bad, but not as perfect), from Willis to the tiny clues (and the revealing walk-through at the end) to the PERFECT blink-and-you-missed-it-but-if-you-saw-it-you-probably-peed-yourself-a-little moment. THE ultimate twist movie, even if you know the ending.

[youtube=http://www.youtube.com/watch?v=u2sDw-XBuKc]

I’ve left out a lot of obvious ones, but if you’ve missed any of the following somehow, make it a point to go see them now:

The Matrix, Fight Club Blade Runner, Grand Canyon, The Ring, The House of Sand and Fog, Requiem for a Dream, Videodrome, The Conversation, Redbelt.

THINGS I LIKE: L. A. Story

lastory

Forget for this moment the smog and the cars and the restaurant and the skating and remember only this. A kiss may not be the truth, but it is what we wish were true.

Harris Telemacher, L.A. Story

There are some movies that just hit you in the right place, right way, right time.  You look back, and on paper, there’s nothing there that should make it special, but every time you rewatch the film, you get that feeling you got the first time you viewed it, and it stays with you or hours or days. You learn the lines by repetition, you find yourself whistling songs in the soundtrack that you would normally hate.

Steve Martin wrote what may be the meanest love story ever with L.A. Story.  Sure, on the surface, it’s a romantic comedy, and on that level as sickly-sweet as anything Sandra Bullock ever did (though, for all the fantasy elements, much more grounded in the way the world really works). But beneath that, it’s a love story about Los Angeles. It’s often described as a satire, but it feels more like a true tribute told through little stabs and punches in the shoulder.  Somehow, Martin and director Mick Jackson managed to fill 90 minutes with some almost cruel truisms about LA residents, yet every one of them is cut and delivered with an undercurrent of, if not respect, then at least a begrudgingly unconditional love.

Martin himself shows all off his sides here.  There’s a bit of the wacky, wild and crazy guy, some straight man, and a lot of philosophy.  And I suppose, all these years after I first saw L.A. Story at an afternoon matinee to kill some time, the philosophy is what sticks with me.

Harris: Ordinarily, I don’t like to be around interesting people because it means I have to be interesting too.
Sara: Are you saying I’m interesting?
Harris: All I’m saying is that, when I’m around you, I find myself showing off, which is the idiot’s version of being interesting.

There are some wonderfully creative concepts in the movie, as well — two in partcular make the movie completely worth watching (without spoiling them, both involve Martin and then-real-life-wife Victoria Tennant; one set around a plane, another in a garden).

Watch L.A. Story. Buy it, and rewatch it until you’ve memorized it, and then watch it some more. There’s a very real magic on display in what may be Martin’s pinnacle as a film writer, although I will apologize in advance if you find yourself whistling an Enya tune after it’s over.

[youtube=http://www.youtube.com/watch?v=GOGGmhmp5ds]

THINGS I LIKE: Other comics and graphic novels

More comics you might like. After 30+ years of collecting, these are the collections that I think either make good entry points, if you’re trying to see if comics are good reading, or just plain stand out above the rest:

THE CROW James O’Barr’s revenge story is based in real life; the tragedy that surrounded the filmed version only heightens the emotional impact.  It’s a classic “alternative” comic, black and white and VERY adult oriented. It’s tough to read, at times, but damned well worth the effort.

ALL-STAR SUPERMAN You’ll hear writers say that writing Superman, after seventy-plus years of publication, is harder and harder to do; after all, what stories are left to be told?  Grant Morrison makes it that much harder for them with this collection of 12 issues that perfectly melds the insanity of the Silver Age with modern storytelling. If ever there was a perfect celebration of perhaps the most iconic comic-book hero ever, this is it.

SANDMAN Neil Gaiman writes quite possibly the most literate comic book ever. Don’t let the fact that this long-running but finite series is worshipped by goth kids and Tori Amos fans frighten you away; there’s a lot here to love, almost a modern-day mythology in it’s own right.

THE AUTHORITY From fairy-tale to the ultimate summer popcorn action movie… Warren Ellis takes the spandex field, deconstructs it, puts it back together and presents quite possibly the most realistic (in a dystopian sort of way) look at a world with super-heroes.  If you strip comics of their innocence, replacing them with the bleak reality of a world filled with greed and violence, this is what you’d get.  And on top of it all, the situations are as epic as you would hope a team possessing this much power would face.

TRANSMETROPOLITAN Another Ellis entry; what if Hunter S. Thompson had written science fiction? As someone who doesn’t enjoy overly political fiction, I was surprised how much I enjoyed this book — I’ll credit Ellis’s excellent writing and the voice he gave protagonist Spider Jerusalem for all of it.

ASTONISHING X-MEN This is not the best gateway book — even if you’ve seen all the X-movies, there’s still a lot of continuity assumed on the reader’s part.  But it is, quite possibly, the best arc in the history of the team.  Joss Whedon — Mr. Cancelled In Spite of Excellence TV — finds all the individual voices and — despite a shaky second-of-four arc — crafts an excellent story with twists and a bitter, bitter ending (at least for those of us that are long time readers).

PREACHER Sixty issues that seem made for Spike TV– a little supernatural, a little action, a little horror, a little wild-west.  This, to me, defines the idea of a “guy’s” comic — it practically radiates testosterone.  And strangely, it’s incredibly popular with girls, too — probably because Jesse Custer is very handsome to go along with his hard-drinking, ass-kicking ways.  Or something. Writer Garth Ennis hit a true home run with this story of one man’s literal hunt for God.

THINGS I LIKE: Barry Ween, Boy Genius

Over the past decade or so, I’ve reviewed CDs and movies and books for a few websites and local newspapers. I’ve been criticized by people for only giving favorable reviews, but there’s a good reason for that: as a freelance writer, I decided that rather than waste my time experiencing things that I don’t enjoy (and then re-experiencing them while reviewing them), I would focus on things that I like, and try to spread the word about good stuff.  Although, I must admit that bashing entertainment that sucks is really fun, sometimes…

“In The Sun Also RisesErnest Hemingway describes genius as the ability to learn at a greater velocity. For a suicidal drunk with a pathological fear of latent homosexuality, Papa did all right.” 

-Barry Ween

The characters are simple enough: a ten-year-old super-genius and his very average (slightly hyperactive, obsessed with the idea of sex, and a big fan of apes) best friend Jeremy. The concept springs from there: what would happen if the experiments of a junior mad scientist went awry? (Answer: hilarity)

Written and illustrated by Judd Winick – better known as either a DC comics writer or former cast member of The Real World, depending on how old you are — Barry Ween Boy Genius is a great example of why I love comic books.  The jokes are enhanced by the illustrations.  The action scenes flow surprisingly well for a “humor” comic. It’s easy enough, reading any of the volumes, to remember and relive what it was like to be an adolescent kid (even if I didn’t occasionally blow the Earth out of its orbit, or turn my babysitters into giant monkeys).

The magic of Barry, for me, is in the balance of cynical, often misanthropic and usually non-sequitur humor (find me a better line than “Jesus was a fan of Leg Show“) and serious consideration of what it would mean to be a ten-year-old with an IQ of 350. As a young “gifted” kid (and yeah, “gifted” and “special” aren’t too far apart), Barry would have been my role model — a comic-book superhero without the spandex, but with plenty of attitude to make up for it.

You can compare the Barry Ween volumes to any number of things — South Park meets Calvin & Hobbes in a meth-fueled car wreck with Dexter’s Lab — but none of those really does the gathered mini-series justice.  It’s got elements of all those things, but — as evidenced especially by the ending of the fourth volume — it has heart, and Winick is not afraid to show it.

onibk_341Finally out a few weeks ago is The Big Book of Barry Ween, Boy Genius, a collection of all four volumes of the comic.  Highly recommended for anyone looking for a good gateway into graphic literature, or just a really good laugh.

Return to abstract ramblings…

I wish this post could be appropriately titled, “Return to Charlotte Rampling.”

Welcome, once again, to the USS Insomniactive.  Today, we’ll be heading down the stream of consciousness.  Strap in and have a few shots.  This could get hairy.  Or really boring.

Depends on perspective.

Early, I thought this:

There is a vast chasm between seeking answers and seeking the answer you want to hear, and chasms impede progress.

And I’m surprised that I never thought it sooner, as it is as applicable to myself (even today, but especially years ago) as it is to anyone that may or may not have inspired the thought.  If you seek out advice, the source of advice is important; not only for the quality of what you will get out of it, but also for knowing what to expect.  Some people will treat a depressed person like a china doll, and tell them exactly what (they think) the depressed person wants  to hear. Some people will tell them bluntly what (they think) they need to hear.

Is one any worse than the other?  I still think that the chasm between the two impedes progress from the sad state to the content, or even happy, state.  It’s not that you can’t cross a chasm, but it takes a lot more time and effort.

Keeping in mind, too, that advice comes from the mouths of humans, and us humans?  We don’t know shit.

On a lot of levels, I’m guessing that there are no definitive answers, nothing quantifiable in a scientific manner.  I argue that if there were, we’d know about “The Answer” by now.

Depression — like anger — is like a warm blanket you got from a British colonial soldier.  It’s comfortable, and warm, and easy to justify hiding inside.  And eventually, it will kill you, because that blanket is diseased, soaked in tuberculosis or syphillis or whatever the current rage is. The trick to beating depression is fighting it, not giving in to it.

Not to suggest that it’s easy, or so matter of fact.  That’s why I chose the word “fighting.”  In time, as you become more practiced and conditioned, fighting becomes easier, but the potential for pain is inherent.

You learn to live with it.

I’m not as sanctimonious as I seem, I think.  Because I’ll tell you up front, the more I know, the more I realize that I know jackshit about fuck-all.  Because I can pass on what I’ve learned from my experiences over 37 years, but I still have trouble remembering my own advice sometimes.  And even remembering, I sometimes choose to ignore. I sometimes  like the cold comfort of withdrawing into my own head and reminding myself of how much better it could be, of how much better it was, of how much the here and now sucks. That’s easy, like falling asleep in the snow instead of pushing on to salvation.

But somewhere in the back of my head, I always know.  Even if I don’t know anything, in the end.

And I realize that there is no universal answer, because the answer — and the question that compels it — is ultimately derived not just from the question but also from all the life experiences that have shaped and affected the seeker from day zero.  It’s contextual.  If it wasn’t, then maybe seeing a psychologist would work for everyone, or taking Effexor, or listening to cinematic music and reading Vonnegut.  But none of these works for everyone.

The best we can do is suggest what has worked for us, offering a path of exploration for the seeker, understanding that theirs might be a different path, and that there is no right or wrong in it.

Also: never try to quantify anyone’s emotions, especially in comparison with your own.  It is impossible — impossible — to know how anyone feels.  You have only your own point of reference for that, and that automatically colors your comparison. Yes, you and I are looking at the same sky, but we can never be sure that we perceive the colo blue the same way.  Every situation affects us differently, you and I, and you can never say that I have it easier or harder, because you have no idea that I see things in the same colors and tones that you do.

At the same time, don’t hesitate to offer advice just because you’ve never gone through X situation.  Maybe you’ve never been divorced, but you have broken up with someone, or felt heartbreak when your dog died. Maybe you’ve never lost your best friend or spouse, but you might have lost a parent or  sibling.

On some level, it becomes a twisted version of method acting.  You place yourself in what you imagine is a comparative place of emotional reaction, and you pass on what you’ve learned, what worked to get you through that moment. Maybe it helps, maybe it doesn’t, but you never know if you don’t try.

Most important of all, though, is reminding yourself day in and out that you can’t be responsible for anyone else’s actions or reactions or — especially — feelings.  If you live to make someone else happy, ultimately, you will fail.  And worse, what will you do when they leave or die?  What will you live for then?

We come into this world alone.  We go out alone, and we invariably spend a fair amount of time in between alone. And you know, that’s okay.  It has to be.

You can’t fix anyone’s problems for them, and you shouldn’t allow others to expect that of you.  All you can do is offer them a path, and hope that there is something from your pain and hard work and seeking that perhaps points them in the right direction for their own solutions.

I’m hungry. Someone get me some lunch.